🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to resume atomic talks with the United States provided that it is treated with "respect" and "respect", Tehran's top diplomat has stated.

Abbas Araghchi declared exclusively dialogue produced results, and shared new appeals had originated from mediators to reopen discussions with the US government. He claimed Iran possessed no undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran could not yet permit the UN nuclear inspectorate to inspect struck enrichment centers for safety concerns.

Navigating a Difficult Route

Araghchi is walking a challenging route since Iran does not want be perceived to be operating from a stance of disadvantage, and he consistently maintained that Iran had emerged more powerful in military terms and mentally from the joint assault on its enrichment centers in June.

He was addressing at a defense forum in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an inalienable right to process nuclear material domestically that it will perpetually retain" – the main reason of the impasse in the earlier negotiations.

Previous Discussions Suddenly Ended

The earlier sessions of talks between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and hostile end on 12 June when Israel, with US support, struck Iranian nuclear sites in a 12-day war that ended with Donald Trump claiming the facilities had been destroyed. Following this, EU nations exercised their right to reinstate international penalties, but Iran asserts they have not had a significant effect.

Perfect Agreement Proposed

Iranian officials claimed they felt they had achieved a "perfect agreement" to the enrichment issue in prior discussions, when it was decided an local partnership with American involvement could process nuclear material. Each party would have been able to declare success since home-based processing would have remained and the US could be certain that Iran's nuclear programme was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been decided in the talks that US nuclear scientists could operate within Iranian territory, but that was a natural consequence of the partnership suggestion. Diplomats claimed repeatedly they had reached agreement with Washington's diplomat the American negotiator only for the arrangement to collapse due to "detractors in America".

Existing Situation

Iran's diplomats said the partnership proposal was now off the table, but it seems quite possible the suggestion could be reintroduced in various formats if negotiations reopen.

The US president in recent days claimed he had been receiving messages that Iran sought to reopen negotiations, but in private Iranian officials say they are not yet obtaining consistent overtures from America either straightforwardly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, Egypt, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been charged of non-responsiveness in the wake of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran asserts diplomacy is not part of a performance.

Diplomatic Stance

In his speech to the forum, intended to paint the US as a hegemonic power that misuses the notion of international law, Araghchi stated the two-week conflict revealed the dispute could not be ended by combat operations. He stated the attacks began with a US demand for an complete Tehran capitulation and concluded with an complete request for a ceasefire.

Iran is certain the first strikes by Israel were carried out with full US knowledge and coordination, making confidence hard to reestablish.

Dialogue Continues the Primary Resolution

The foreign minister said: "Tehran was not the one that had fled diplomacy; it was the United States and the Western nations that had consistently sought to enforce their demands during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be alive and stays the final solution to resolve conflicts, but its standards, regulations and principles must be followed."

"In case they talk to the nation of Iran with the tone of dignity and respect, they will receive a reply in the equivalent language."

Restoration and Recovery

In what is described by Iran's diplomats as the conflict of recovery and recovery, the foreign minister said he was assured Iran's security strengths "are considerably enhanced than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been rebuilt. We gained numerous insights from this war; we have discovered our internal vulnerabilities and the weaknesses of the adversary."

He added: "We managed to survive this engagement. Our atomic expertise, which they aimed to obliterate, continues to exist. The sites and machinery, if destroyed, will be rebuilt; what is crucial is the resolve of the citizens of Tehran and then the national cohesion that they sought to undermine, but did not succeed to break. The Iranian people have grown more resilient, more united, and more backing of the administration and the country in the face of this invasion."